2020 Results
2019 Results
2018 Results
2017 Results
See www.superiortiming.com for results
2016 Results
Click here or see www.superiortiming.com for results.
2015 Results
See www.superiortiming.com for results
2014 Results
Searchable courtesy of Superior Timing
2013 Results
Searchable courtesy of Superior Timing | Overall Results | Results by Age Group
50km Freestyle | Overall | Age Group |
50km Classic | Overall | Age Group |
25km Freestyle | Overall | Age Group |
25km Classic | Overall | Age Group |
14km Freestyle | Overall | Age Group |
14km Classic | Overall | Age Group |
2012 Results
Searchable | Snow Bike | Photos
50km Freestyle | Overall | Division | Age Group |
50km Classic | Overall | Division | Age Group |
26km Freestyle | Overall | Division | Age Group |
26km Classic | Overall | Division | Age Group |
14km Freestyle | Overall | Division | Age Group |
2011 | Overall | Division | Age Group | Photos |
2010 | Overall | Division | Age Group | Photos |
2009 | Overall | Division | Age Group | Photos |
2008 | Overall | Division | Age Group | |
2007 | Overall | Division | Age Group | |
2006 | Overall | Division | Age Group | Gender |
2005 | Overall | Division | Age Group | |
2004 | Overall | Division | Age Group | |
2003 |
According to a central government estimate, the number of surplus places across England had
reached some 1.5 million by the early 1990s (DES 1992). It was generated by a national
decline in the birth rate since the 1970s and by local demographic changes such as population
drift away from rural areas. Reorganisation tends to be unpopular with parents and staff in
schools who become aware of what they stand to lose from it long before they experience
what they might gain. Many local councillors, mindful of the risk that a disliked policy might
cost them precious votes among parents of school age children, were unwilling to tackle the
mounting surplus. By this time, ministers in the past Conservative central government, like
their counterparts in other countries including the USA (Osborne and Gaebler 1992), had
embarked on a raft of policies to reduce burgeoning expenditure in the public sector through
attempts to increase efficiency of service provision. Within this policy thrust, ministers
eventually gave themselves powers to intervene if LEAs with a substantial proportion of
surplus places did not undertake reorganisation initiatives of their own (custom writings 2019).
Accompanying this threat was a central government incentive for LEAs: a related policy
enabled them to borrow capital from the centre at a very advantageous interest rate
specifically for school building and refurbishment connected with reorganisation. The more
places removed, the more capital borrowing allowed.
reached some 1.5 million by the early 1990s (DES 1992). It was generated by a national
decline in the birth rate since the 1970s and by local demographic changes such as population
drift away from rural areas. Reorganisation tends to be unpopular with parents and staff in
schools who become aware of what they stand to lose from it long before they experience
what they might gain. Many local councillors, mindful of the risk that a disliked policy might
cost them precious votes among parents of school age children, were unwilling to tackle the
mounting surplus. By this time, ministers in the past Conservative central government, like
their counterparts in other countries including the USA (Osborne and Gaebler 1992), had
embarked on a raft of policies to reduce burgeoning expenditure in the public sector through
attempts to increase efficiency of service provision. Within this policy thrust, ministers
eventually gave themselves powers to intervene if LEAs with a substantial proportion of
surplus places did not undertake reorganisation initiatives of their own (custom writings 2019).
Accompanying this threat was a central government incentive for LEAs: a related policy
enabled them to borrow capital from the centre at a very advantageous interest rate
specifically for school building and refurbishment connected with reorganisation. The more
places removed, the more capital borrowing allowed.